RECORD BREAKING DEAL! Google paid Apple $1bn to be default iOS search engine
Google and Apple are competitors. So why is Google the default search engine for Safari that is cellular telephone, that is the pre-installed web browser on iPhones and iPads? court records shown on Thursday, The reply, is straightforward: money talks. And the sum Google paid Apple in 2014 for the prerogative of default use of the countless millions of users that are iPhone, $1bn, speaks loudly.
The info came to light within Google’s suit with Silicon Valley giant Oracle, which accuses the search company of infringing on the patents for programming language of Oracle Java in its Android operating system.
On the very top of the $1bn payment, which was reported as a rumour by TechCrunch in 2013 but not supported until now, the attorneys of Oracle also disclosed that Google and Apple discussed a piece of the earnings Google received from revealing iOS users adverts.
The payments kept Google for cellular telephone Safari as the default search engine, letting it continue to cash in on iOS. And being the default option is not unimportant: when Apple changed from Google Maps inhouse team for the info supporting the default map program on iPhones in the year 2012, the newest program was criticised because of its error-ridden maps.
That is millions of users who Google show adverts to or can not get information from. Elsewhere in iOS, Apple has already been detaching itself the default search engine on Siri is the Bing of Microsoft, and the user changes that can’t.
Other amounts released in court help show quite Google was keen to pay its users Apple enormous amounts of funds. The Android operating system, the hottest on earth of Google, has produced gain of $22bn and sales of $31bn in its life.
Money is made by Google’s from Android in two ways: it reveals Android users display advertising, also it takes a percentage of the sales of media and programs on the Google Play Shop. Apart from Pixel and its Nexus -branded devices, it will not receive any earnings in the selling of Android telephones – in marked comparison to Apple.
Google was not happy using the publication of the sales amounts, nevertheless, telling the court as well as Oracle that they ought to not have now been made public. “That nonpublic financial data is highly sensitive, and public disclosure may have major negative effects on Google’s company.”
